You are reviewing a proposed data center agreement on behalf of the community that would host it.
You are not the developer's lawyer. Be concrete and quote the document.

Attached or pasted below is the agreement under negotiation.
Benchmark data on what other communities actually signed is at https://futurepickleballcourt.com/all.md

Answer these, in order:

1. For each of the terms below, quote the exact language in this agreement, or write NOT PRESENT.
   1. Community fund. A strong version: A fund that scales with the project, with a community seat on the body that spends it.
   2. Clawbacks. A strong version: Incentives come back if the facility stops operating, not only if a jobs number is missed.
   3. Decommissioning. A strong version: A bond, escrow, or letter of credit that pays for teardown and site restoration if the operator walks.
   4. Grid costs. A strong version: The operator pays for its own interconnection and carries a minimum bill that survives it leaving.
   5. Water. A strong version: A stated cap or closed-loop cooling, plus public reporting.
   6. Noise. A strong version: A numeric limit measured at the nearest residence or property line.
   7. Jobs. A strong version: Binding job commitments with a consequence, not projections.
   8. Local contracting. A strong version: Local subcontracting goals and haul-route road repair paid by the operator.
   9. Transparency. A strong version: No NDA, the agreement is public, and an independent audit on a schedule.
   10. Tax incentives. A strong version: A but-for test before any abatement, with the forgone revenue stated.

2. For every term that is present, quote any language that softens it: good faith, commercially
   reasonable, best efforts, sole discretion, subject to availability, as determined by the company,
   or similar. For each one, say plainly whether it is an obligation or a preference. A term that
   sounds protective and cannot be enforced is worse than no term, because it ends the conversation.

3. Which terms here are weaker than what other communities have already signed? Name the comparison.

4. Walk through what happens if this facility is built and then stops operating in year six.
   Who pays to tear it down. Who pays for the grid capacity built to serve it. What happens to the
   tax revenue the budget now depends on. Point to the clause that answers each, or say there is none.

5. Who can enforce each promise, and how. If only the local government can sue, say so. If residents
   are excluded as third party beneficiaries, say so.

6. List the three changes that would most improve this deal for the community, in priority order,
   with specific language to propose for each.

Do not soften your answer to be agreeable. If the deal is good, say that too.


OPTIONAL, IF YOU WANT THIS DEAL ADDED TO THE PUBLIC BENCHMARK

Print the block below, filled in. Leave a line blank if the document does not answer it.
Do not guess. A blank is useful; a guess is not.
Then send it to deals@futurepickleballcourt.com with a link to the document.

  PLACE:            (city or county, state)
  OPERATOR:         (who will run it, if named)
  DEVELOPER:        (who signed, if different)
  AGREEMENT TYPE:   (development agreement, proffer, tax abatement, land sale, other)
  DATE SIGNED:      (YYYY-MM-DD)
  DOCUMENT URL:     (a public link anyone can open)
  STATUS:           (signed, approved, proposed, withdrawn, terminated)
  COMMUNITY FUND:     (what the document says, and the section number)
  CLAWBACKS:          (what the document says, and the section number)
  DECOMMISSIONING:    (what the document says, and the section number)
  GRID COSTS:         (what the document says, and the section number)
  WATER:              (what the document says, and the section number)
  NOISE:              (what the document says, and the section number)
  JOBS:               (what the document says, and the section number)
  LOCAL CONTRACTING:  (what the document says, and the section number)
  TRANSPARENCY:       (what the document says, and the section number)
  TAX INCENTIVES:     (what the document says, and the section number)
  SOFTENING LANGUAGE: (any good faith, reasonable efforts, or sole discretion wording, quoted)

Accuracy matters more than completeness. Every line will be checked against the document
before it is published, and anything that cannot be found there will be removed.